Skip to content
Live
Market Cap:$2.70T+0.03%
24h Vol:$97.9B
BTC:59.5%
ETH:10.9%
Coins:22,783
Sushi

Sushi

SUSHI
Uniswap
Uniswap
UNI

Fundamental comparison between Sushi and Uniswap

Not Financial Advice

This page is an informational analysis, not investment advice. The CryptoValue Score is an algorithmically generated rating from public data — it does not replace professional advice. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile; total loss is possible. Read full risk disclaimer →

Sushi

Sushi

81.9
050100
Strong Value
24h+0.48%
7d-8.54%

Coverage: 12/13 · 94%

Calculated:

Uniswap

Uniswap

71.3
050100
Undervalued
24h+6.61%
7d+4.96%

Coverage: 13/13 · 100%

Calculated:

Purpose, token role and risks compared

Project context from the same profiles used on the coin pages. Editorial context outside the score.

Sushi / Uniswap
Purpose and users

Sushi (SUSHI)

No sourced project profile has been recorded for this coin yet.

Uniswap (UNI)

Uniswap enables token swaps through liquidity pools instead of a central order book. Traders use the pools; liquidity providers supply the tokens available for trading. [1]

Token role

Sushi (SUSHI)

Not yet recorded.

Uniswap (UNI)

UNI provides voting rights in protocol governance. The documentation also describes protocol fees used to burn UNI. This is not a direct fee distribution to all UNI holders. [2][3]

Key risks

Sushi (SUSHI)

Not yet recorded.

Uniswap (UNI)

  • Token mechanics: fee rules vary by version and pool and can change through governance. A burn does not guarantee a higher UNI price; this is our economic interpretation. [4][2]
  • Liquidity providers: price changes can leave a position worse off than simply holding the tokens (impermanent loss). This affects a pool position, not automatically a UNI holding. [5]
  • Contracts: additional v4 hooks introduce their own security risks. A hook extends a pool; the safety of one extension does not establish the safety of other pools. [6]
Example

Sushi (SUSHI)

Not yet recorded.

Uniswap (UNI)

Example: a wallet swaps one token for another through a pool. This is a different role from holding UNI or providing liquidity.

Sources and review date

Sushi (SUSHI)

Not yet recorded.

Uniswap (UNI)

Sources checked on

Sources and scope (6)

Summary of the linked project documentation, not an independent security audit or a complete risk assessment. Examples illustrate usage.

  1. Uniswap · How Uniswap works ↗
  2. Uniswap · UNI token ↗
  3. Uniswap · Governance FAQs and fee distributions ↗
  4. Uniswap · Protocol fee configuration ↗
  5. Uniswap · Protocol glossary ↗
  6. Uniswap · v4 security framework ↗
View complete profile →

Detailed Comparison

MetricSushiUniswap
Price$0.193221$7.64
Market Cap$55.41M$4.63B
24h Volume3.7M662.2M
Rank#416#22
Circulating Supply286.8M606.5M
ATH$23.38$44.92

Sushi vs Uniswap — Analysis

Comparison of Sushi and Uniswap: published market readings and a Value Score using up to 13 model components. Sourced project profiles add purpose, token role and risks where available.

Value Score Comparison

Sushi: 81.9/100; Uniswap: 71.3/100. No direct score comparison: data coverage, calculation timestamp differ or are unrecorded.

Market Capitalization

Uniswap has 83.62 times the market capitalization of Sushi. This ratio measures market size; it does not establish volatility or future returns.

Price Performance

Reported price change over 24 hours: Sushi 0.48%, Uniswap 6.61%. Over 7 days: Sushi -8.54%, Uniswap 4.96%. Missing readings are shown as —.

Distance from All-Time High

Sushi trades at 0.83% of its reported all-time high; Uniswap at 17.01%. This distance describes price history and is not a standalone buy signal.

Conclusion

The readings show differences in market value and model assessment. Project purpose, token rights, risks, source dates and data coverage also matter. A higher score does not predict higher returns or lower risk.