Convex Finance
CVX
Fundamental comparison between Convex Finance and Lido DAO
Not Financial Advice
This page is an informational analysis, not investment advice. The CryptoValue Score is an algorithmically generated rating from public data — it does not replace professional advice. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile; total loss is possible. Read full risk disclaimer →
Convex Finance
Coverage: 12/13 · 94%
Calculated:
Lido DAO
Coverage: 12/13 · 94%
Calculated:
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | Convex Finance | Lido DAO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.87 | $0.33144 |
| Market Cap | $174.12M | $274.95M |
| 24h Volume | 5.4M | 17.2M |
| Rank | #185 | #139 |
| Circulating Supply | 93.2M | 829.6M |
| ATH | $60.09 | $7.30 |
Convex Finance vs Lido DAO — Analysis
Comparison of Convex Finance and Lido DAO: published market readings and a Value Score using up to 13 model components. Sourced project profiles add purpose, token role and risks where available.
Value Score Comparison
Convex Finance: 79.8/100; Lido DAO: 78.1/100. The difference is 1.7 score points with the same model, coverage and calculation timestamp.
Market Capitalization
Lido DAO has 1.58 times the market capitalization of Convex Finance. This ratio measures market size; it does not establish volatility or future returns.
Price Performance
Reported price change over 24 hours: Convex Finance -3.2%, Lido DAO 1%. Over 7 days: Convex Finance -21.17%, Lido DAO -13.51%. Missing readings are shown as —.
Distance from All-Time High
Convex Finance trades at 3.11% of its reported all-time high; Lido DAO at 4.54%. This distance describes price history and is not a standalone buy signal.
Conclusion
The readings show differences in market value and model assessment. Project purpose, token rights, risks, source dates and data coverage also matter. A higher score does not predict higher returns or lower risk.