Skip to content
Live
Market Cap:$2.63T-2.29%
24h Vol:$66.5B
BTC:59.3%
ETH:10.7%
Coins:22,751
Convex Finance

Convex Finance

CVX
Frax (prev. FXS)
Frax (prev. FXS)
FRAX

Fundamental comparison between Convex Finance and Frax (prev. FXS)

Not Financial Advice

This page is an informational analysis, not investment advice. The CryptoValue Score is an algorithmically generated rating from public data — it does not replace professional advice. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile; total loss is possible. Read full risk disclaimer →

Convex Finance

Convex Finance

79.1
050100
Undervalued
24h-3.85%
7d-18.59%

Coverage: 12/13 · 94%

Calculated:

Frax (prev. FXS)

Frax (prev. FXS)

78.7
050100
Undervalued
24h-1.76%
7d-8.09%

Coverage: 12/13 · 94%

Calculated:

Detailed Comparison

MetricConvex FinanceFrax (prev. FXS)
Price$1.90$0.24158
Market Cap$177.10M$22.61M
24h Volume4.4M439.9K
Rank#183#775
Circulating Supply93.2M93.6M
ATH$60.09$42.80

Convex Finance vs Frax (prev. FXS) — Analysis

Comparison of Convex Finance and Frax (prev. FXS): published market readings and a Value Score using up to 13 model components. Sourced project profiles add purpose, token role and risks where available.

Value Score Comparison

Convex Finance: 79.1/100; Frax (prev. FXS): 78.7/100. No direct score comparison: calculation timestamp differ or are unrecorded.

Market Capitalization

Convex Finance has 7.83 times the market capitalization of Frax (prev. FXS). This ratio measures market size; it does not establish volatility or future returns.

Price Performance

Reported price change over 24 hours: Convex Finance -3.85%, Frax (prev. FXS) -1.76%. Over 7 days: Convex Finance -18.59%, Frax (prev. FXS) -8.09%. Missing readings are shown as —.

Distance from All-Time High

Convex Finance trades at 3.16% of its reported all-time high; Frax (prev. FXS) at 0.56%. This distance describes price history and is not a standalone buy signal.

Conclusion

The readings show differences in market value and model assessment. Project purpose, token rights, risks, source dates and data coverage also matter. A higher score does not predict higher returns or lower risk.