
Convex Finance
CVXFundamental comparison between Convex Finance and Frax (prev. FXS)
Not Financial Advice
This page is an informational analysis, not investment advice. The CryptoValue Score is an algorithmically generated rating from public data — it does not replace professional advice. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile; total loss is possible. Read full risk disclaimer →
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | Convex Finance | Frax (prev. FXS) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.90 | $0.24158 |
| Market Cap | $177.10M | $22.61M |
| 24h Volume | 4.4M | 439.9K |
| Rank | #183 | #775 |
| Circulating Supply | 93.2M | 93.6M |
| ATH | $60.09 | $42.80 |
Convex Finance vs Frax (prev. FXS) — Analysis
Comparison of Convex Finance and Frax (prev. FXS): published market readings and a Value Score using up to 13 model components. Sourced project profiles add purpose, token role and risks where available.
Value Score Comparison
Convex Finance: 79.1/100; Frax (prev. FXS): 78.7/100. No direct score comparison: calculation timestamp differ or are unrecorded.
Market Capitalization
Convex Finance has 7.83 times the market capitalization of Frax (prev. FXS). This ratio measures market size; it does not establish volatility or future returns.
Price Performance
Reported price change over 24 hours: Convex Finance -3.85%, Frax (prev. FXS) -1.76%. Over 7 days: Convex Finance -18.59%, Frax (prev. FXS) -8.09%. Missing readings are shown as —.
Distance from All-Time High
Convex Finance trades at 3.16% of its reported all-time high; Frax (prev. FXS) at 0.56%. This distance describes price history and is not a standalone buy signal.
Conclusion
The readings show differences in market value and model assessment. Project purpose, token rights, risks, source dates and data coverage also matter. A higher score does not predict higher returns or lower risk.