Beam
BEAM
Fundamental comparison between Beam and GALA
Not Financial Advice
This page is an informational analysis, not investment advice. The CryptoValue Score is an algorithmically generated rating from public data — it does not replace professional advice. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile; total loss is possible. Read full risk disclaimer →
Beam
Coverage: 11/13 · 84%
Calculated:
GALA
Coverage: 10/13 · 74%
Calculated:
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | Beam | GALA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003937 | $0.001642 |
| Market Cap | $198.10M | $83.83M |
| 24h Volume | 35.3M | 9.3M |
| Rank | #166 | #300 |
| Circulating Supply | 50.3B | 51B |
| ATH | $0.044163 | $0.824837 |
Beam vs GALA — Analysis
Comparison of Beam and GALA: published market readings and a Value Score using up to 13 model components. Sourced project profiles add purpose, token role and risks where available.
Value Score Comparison
Beam: 66.1/100; GALA: 80.8/100. No direct score comparison: data coverage, calculation timestamp differ or are unrecorded.
Market Capitalization
Beam has 2.36 times the market capitalization of GALA. This ratio measures market size; it does not establish volatility or future returns.
Price Performance
Reported price change over 24 hours: Beam -8.27%, GALA -0.87%. Over 7 days: Beam 14.83%, GALA -8.62%. Missing readings are shown as —.
Distance from All-Time High
Beam trades at 8.92% of its reported all-time high; GALA at 0.2%. This distance describes price history and is not a standalone buy signal.
Conclusion
The readings show differences in market value and model assessment. Project purpose, token rights, risks, source dates and data coverage also matter. A higher score does not predict higher returns or lower risk.