7 Best Thinking Cat Alternatives in 2026
Last updated: 8/12/2026 · 7 alternatives
Thinking Cat (HMM) is one of the more recognized cryptocurrencies with a current Value Score of 66/100. But is Thinking Cat the best choice in its segment? We identified 7 alternatives operating in the same market segment — ranked by our fundamental Value Score, which combines 10 market, supply and developer metrics. Each alternative is compared against the original so you can decide with full data.
Not Financial Advice
This page is an informational analysis, not investment advice. The CryptoValue Score is an algorithmically generated rating from public data — it does not replace professional advice. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile; total loss is possible. Read full risk disclaimer →
How we pick alternatives
How we pick alternatives: (1) Same category as Thinking Cat — functionally comparable projects (Layer-1 vs Layer-1, DeFi vs DeFi, etc.). (2) Sorted by Value Score descending — coins with stronger fundamentals are prioritized. (3) Market cap is shown for context: smaller caps have higher percentage upside, larger caps offer more liquidity and established adoption.
POL (ex-MATIC) (POL)
Rank #79 · $800.21M · $0.074852
Why an alternative: Significantly stronger fundamentals (score 79 vs 66) — same use case, higher data quality.
Bitcoin Cash (BCH)
Rank #22 · $4.31B · $214.52
Why an alternative: Significantly stronger fundamentals (score 77 vs 66) — same use case, higher data quality.
Pepe (PEPE)
Rank #60 · $1.21B · $0.000003
Why an alternative: Significantly stronger fundamentals (score 77 vs 66) — same use case, higher data quality.
Internet Computer (ICP)
Rank #61 · $1.17B · $2.10
Why an alternative: Significantly stronger fundamentals (score 76 vs 66) — same use case, higher data quality.
Polkadot (DOT)
Rank #52 · $1.45B · $0.851868
Why an alternative: Significantly stronger fundamentals (score 76 vs 66) — same use case, higher data quality.
Cosmos Hub (ATOM)
Rank #83 · $707.35M · $1.35
Why an alternative: Larger, more established position (market cap $707.35M) — lower idiosyncratic risk, more liquidity.
Dogecoin (DOGE)
Rank #11 · $10.91B · $0.07022
Why an alternative: Larger, more established position (market cap $10.91B) — lower idiosyncratic risk, more liquidity.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Coin | Score | Market Cap | Price | 30d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thinking Cat(HMM) · original | 66 | $16.25M | $0.016248 | +0.00% |
| POL (ex-MATIC)(POL) | 79(+14) | $800.21M | $0.074852 | -0.10% |
| Bitcoin Cash(BCH) | 77(+11) | $4.31B | $214.52 | -10.80% |
| Pepe(PEPE) | 77(+11) | $1.21B | $0.000003 | +5.20% |
| Internet Computer(ICP) | 76(+11) | $1.17B | $2.10 | -5.40% |
| Polkadot(DOT) | 76(+11) | $1.45B | $0.851868 | -3.10% |
| Cosmos Hub(ATOM) | 75(+9) | $707.35M | $1.35 | -15.10% |
| Dogecoin(DOGE) | 74(+9) | $10.91B | $0.07022 | -8.00% |
Bottom Line
Currently POL (ex-MATIC) has a better Value Score than Thinking Cat (79 vs 66) in the same use case. That doesn't automatically mean "buy instead of Thinking Cat" — liquidity, network effects, and personal risk tolerance matter. But for investors actively looking for alternatives, the top 3 coins on this list are the best starting point for your own research.
Thinking Cat in Market Context
Market Position
Thinking Cat (HMM) ranks #898 outside the top 100 — higher upside potential paired with significantly elevated liquidity and delisting risk, with a current market cap of $16.25 M. Thinking Cat is a memecoin — sentiment- and community-driven, historically prone to extreme volatility cycles.
Recent Price Action
Current price $0.0162 is at 77% of ATH ($0.0210) — typical mid-cycle range with room in both directions. Over the last 7 days, Thinking Cat has rallied a strong +2071.9%; over 30 days it has moved sideways at +0.00%.
Valuation Signals
A Value Score of 65.7/100 places Thinking Cat in the "Undervalued" zone, indicating a discount versus realized market cap and network activity. Low dev activity (score 0/100) is a cluster risk — project stagnation elevates long-term delisting risk. The NVT ratio (90/100) shows healthy network activity relative to market cap.
Risk Profile
Memecoin risks: sentiment-crash vulnerability (no fundamentals anchor), influencer pump-and-dump patterns, and average drawdowns from peak exceeding 90%. Strong tokenomics (85/100): bounded emission, decentralized distribution, and no activation cliffs on the horizon. Outside the top 100, exchange liquidity is thin and slippage on larger trades is non-trivial.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best alternative to Thinking Cat?
Based on our Value Score, POL (ex-MATIC) (POL, score 79/100) is currently the highest-rated alternative in the crypto segment. "Best" depends on your requirements though — liquidity, smart contract functionality, energy efficiency, etc.
Why should I consider alternatives to Thinking Cat?
Three main reasons: (1) Diversification — concentration risk in a single crypto is dangerous. (2) Higher upside potential — smaller coins in the same segment can rise more in percentage terms if fundamentals are solid. (3) Different trade-offs — e.g. higher transaction speed, lower fees, or better decentralization. Caveat: smaller coins also carry more risk and lower liquidity.
Are these alternatives better than Thinking Cat?
"Better" is subjective. The list is sorted by Value Score — coins with stronger fundamentals at the top. But the score doesn't capture everything: network effects, brand recognition, regulatory clarity, and adoption speed are additional factors. Use the list as a starting point for deeper research, not as a final buy decision.
How were these alternatives selected?
We filter all coins in our database (1000+ coins) by the same category as Thinking Cat, exclude Thinking Cat itself, and sort by Value Score descending. The top 7 are listed here. The list auto-updates as scores change (hourly).