
7 Best Quant Alternatives in 2026
Last updated: 7/31/2026 · 🏗️ Infrastructure · 7 alternatives
Quant (QNT) is one of the most well-known Infrastructure cryptocurrencies with a current Value Score of 52/100. But is Quant the best choice in its segment? We identified 7 alternatives operating in the same Infrastructure space — ranked by our fundamental Value Score, which combines 10 on-chain and market metrics. Each alternative is compared against the original so you can decide with full data.
Not Financial Advice
This page is an informational analysis, not investment advice. The CryptoValue Score is an algorithmically generated rating from public data — it does not replace professional advice. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile; total loss is possible. Read full risk disclaimer →
How we pick alternatives
How we pick alternatives: (1) Same category as Quant — functionally comparable projects (Layer-1 vs Layer-1, DeFi vs DeFi, etc.). (2) Sorted by Value Score descending — coins with stronger fundamentals are prioritized. (3) Market cap is shown for context: smaller caps have higher percentage upside, larger caps offer more liquidity and established adoption.

Livepeer (LPT)
Rank #358 · $62.59M · $1.26
Why an alternative: Higher Value Score (72 vs 52) with smaller market cap — more upside potential with stronger fundamentals.

Ankr Network (ANKR)
Rank #569 · $33.66M · $0.003366
Why an alternative: Higher Value Score (71 vs 52) with smaller market cap — more upside potential with stronger fundamentals.

Helium (HNT)
Rank #572 · $33.30M · $0.183362
Why an alternative: Higher Value Score (71 vs 52) with smaller market cap — more upside potential with stronger fundamentals.

Siacoin (SC)
Rank #705 · $25.05M · $0.000504
Why an alternative: Higher Value Score (69 vs 52) with smaller market cap — more upside potential with stronger fundamentals.

Golem (GLM)
Rank #272 · $92.27M · $0.092266
Why an alternative: Higher Value Score (65 vs 52) with smaller market cap — more upside potential with stronger fundamentals.

Arweave (AR)
Rank #238 · $113.40M · $1.73
Why an alternative: Higher Value Score (64 vs 52) with smaller market cap — more upside potential with stronger fundamentals.

Theta Network (THETA)
Rank #220 · $123.98M · $0.123977
Why an alternative: Higher Value Score (64 vs 52) with smaller market cap — more upside potential with stronger fundamentals.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Coin | Score | Market Cap | Price | 30d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Quant(QNT) · original | 52 | $884.59M | $60.83 | -7.40% |
Livepeer(LPT) | 72(+20) | $62.59M | $1.26 | -16.40% |
Ankr Network(ANKR) | 71(+19) | $33.66M | $0.003366 | +1.13% |
Helium(HNT) | 71(+18) | $33.30M | $0.183362 | -23.15% |
Siacoin(SC) | 69(+16) | $25.05M | $0.000504 | -19.23% |
Golem(GLM) | 65(+13) | $92.27M | $0.092266 | -16.50% |
Arweave(AR) | 64(+12) | $113.40M | $1.73 | -9.90% |
Theta Network(THETA) | 64(+11) | $123.98M | $0.123977 | -2.30% |
Bottom Line
Currently Livepeer has a better Value Score than Quant (72 vs 52) in the same use case. That doesn't automatically mean "buy instead of Quant" — liquidity, network effects, and personal risk tolerance matter. But for investors actively looking for alternatives, the top 3 coins on this list are the best starting point for your own research.
Quant in Market Context
Market Position
Quant (QNT) currently sits in the long-tail without a stable top-100 rank — higher upside but materially elevated risk, with a current market cap of $884.59 M. Quant falls into a specialized category with valuation drivers that differ from mainstream L1s and DeFi tokens.
Recent Price Action
At $60.83 (only 14% of the ATH of $427.42), Quant is in a deep correction — drawdowns of this magnitude have historically offered attractive re-entry zones depending on fundamentals. Over the last 7 days, Quant has moved sideways at −3.9%; over 30 days it has dropped −7.4%.
Valuation Signals
At 52.1/100, Quant is in "Fair Value" territory — market and fundamentals are balanced; no clear buy or sell signal from valuation alone. MVRV at 85/100 suggests a favorable valuation relative to realized cap. Low dev activity (score 30/100) is a cluster risk — project stagnation elevates long-term delisting risk.
Risk Profile
Specialized tokens carry use-case concentration risk: if the core thesis fails, pivoting is rarely viable. Strong tokenomics (85/100): bounded emission, decentralized distribution, and no activation cliffs on the horizon. Outside the top 100, exchange liquidity is thin and slippage on larger trades is non-trivial.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best alternative to Quant?
Based on our Value Score, Livepeer (LPT, score 72/100) is currently the highest-rated alternative in the Infrastructure segment. "Best" depends on your requirements though — liquidity, smart contract functionality, energy efficiency, etc.
Why should I consider alternatives to Quant?
Three main reasons: (1) Diversification — concentration risk in a single crypto is dangerous. (2) Higher upside potential — smaller coins in the same segment can rise more in percentage terms if fundamentals are solid. (3) Different trade-offs — e.g. higher transaction speed, lower fees, or better decentralization. Caveat: smaller coins also carry more risk and lower liquidity.
Are these alternatives better than Quant?
"Better" is subjective. The list is sorted by Value Score — coins with stronger fundamentals at the top. But the score doesn't capture everything: network effects, brand recognition, regulatory clarity, and adoption speed are additional factors. Use the list as a starting point for deeper research, not as a final buy decision.
How were these alternatives selected?
We filter all coins in our database (1000+ coins) by the same category as Quant (Infrastructure), exclude Quant itself, and sort by Value Score descending. The top 7 are listed here. The list auto-updates as scores change (hourly).
