7 Best Pocket Network Alternatives in 2026
Last updated: 8/6/2026 · 🏗️ Infrastructure · 7 alternatives
Pocket Network (POKT) is one of the most well-known Infrastructure cryptocurrencies with a current Value Score of 71/100. But is Pocket Network the best choice in its segment? We identified 7 alternatives operating in the same Infrastructure space — ranked by our fundamental Value Score, which combines 10 market, supply and developer metrics. Each alternative is compared against the original so you can decide with full data.
Not Financial Advice
This page is an informational analysis, not investment advice. The CryptoValue Score is an algorithmically generated rating from public data — it does not replace professional advice. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile; total loss is possible. Read full risk disclaimer →
How we pick alternatives
How we pick alternatives: (1) Same category as Pocket Network — functionally comparable projects (Layer-1 vs Layer-1, DeFi vs DeFi, etc.). (2) Sorted by Value Score descending — coins with stronger fundamentals are prioritized. (3) Market cap is shown for context: smaller caps have higher percentage upside, larger caps offer more liquidity and established adoption.
Ankr Network (ANKR)
Rank #569 · $34.70M · $0.003469
Why an alternative: Larger, more established position (market cap $34.70M) — lower idiosyncratic risk, more liquidity.
Storj (STORJ)
Rank #1405 · $19.01M · $0.044733
Why an alternative: Score 80/100 — alternative in the same market segment with a different risk-reward profile.
Siacoin (SC)
Rank #713 · $24.88M · $0.000502
Why an alternative: Score 79/100 — alternative in the same market segment with a different risk-reward profile.
Helium (HNT)
Rank #590 · $32.74M · $0.180349
Why an alternative: Larger, more established position (market cap $32.74M) — lower idiosyncratic risk, more liquidity.
Arweave (AR)
Rank #228 · $119.96M · $1.83
Why an alternative: Larger, more established position (market cap $119.96M) — lower idiosyncratic risk, more liquidity.
Theta Network (THETA)
Rank #211 · $133.20M · $0.133211
Why an alternative: Larger, more established position (market cap $133.20M) — lower idiosyncratic risk, more liquidity.
Livepeer (LPT)
Rank #349 · $64.23M · $1.29
Why an alternative: Larger, more established position (market cap $64.23M) — lower idiosyncratic risk, more liquidity.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Coin | Score | Market Cap | Price | 30d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pocket Network(POKT) · original | 71 | $14.08M | $0.006999 | -10.83% |
| Ankr Network(ANKR) | 80(+8) | $34.70M | $0.003469 | -5.60% |
| Storj(STORJ) | 80(+8) | $19.01M | $0.044733 | -41.70% |
| Siacoin(SC) | 79(+8) | $24.88M | $0.000502 | -22.40% |
| Helium(HNT) | 78(+7) | $32.74M | $0.180349 | -24.90% |
| Arweave(AR) | 77(+6) | $119.96M | $1.83 | -10.50% |
| Theta Network(THETA) | 76(+5) | $133.20M | $0.133211 | -10.60% |
| Livepeer(LPT) | 75(+4) | $64.23M | $1.29 | -20.50% |
Bottom Line
Currently Ankr Network has a better Value Score than Pocket Network (80 vs 71) in the same use case. That doesn't automatically mean "buy instead of Pocket Network" — liquidity, network effects, and personal risk tolerance matter. But for investors actively looking for alternatives, the top 3 coins on this list are the best starting point for your own research.
Pocket Network in Market Context
Market Position
Pocket Network (POKT) currently sits in the long-tail without a stable top-100 rank — higher upside but materially elevated risk, with a current market cap of $14.08 M. As an infrastructure protocol, Pocket Network serves developer tooling or oracle/storage functions — performance tracks broader ecosystem activity.
Recent Price Action
At $0.006999 (only 0% of the ATH of $3.11), Pocket Network is in a deep correction — drawdowns of this magnitude have historically offered attractive re-entry zones depending on fundamentals. Over the last 7 days, Pocket Network has moved sideways at +1.9%; over 30 days it has dropped −10.8%.
Valuation Signals
A Value Score of 71.1/100 places Pocket Network in the "Undervalued" zone, indicating a discount versus realized market cap and network activity. MVRV at 95/100 suggests a favorable valuation relative to realized cap. Low dev activity (score 0/100) is a cluster risk — project stagnation elevates long-term delisting risk.
Risk Profile
Infrastructure risks: value capture is hard when protocols function as public goods — the "fat protocol thesis" remains unsettled. Strong tokenomics (70/100): bounded emission, decentralized distribution, and no activation cliffs on the horizon. Outside the top 100, exchange liquidity is thin and slippage on larger trades is non-trivial.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best alternative to Pocket Network?
Based on our Value Score, Ankr Network (ANKR, score 80/100) is currently the highest-rated alternative in the Infrastructure segment. "Best" depends on your requirements though — liquidity, smart contract functionality, energy efficiency, etc.
Why should I consider alternatives to Pocket Network?
Three main reasons: (1) Diversification — concentration risk in a single crypto is dangerous. (2) Higher upside potential — smaller coins in the same segment can rise more in percentage terms if fundamentals are solid. (3) Different trade-offs — e.g. higher transaction speed, lower fees, or better decentralization. Caveat: smaller coins also carry more risk and lower liquidity.
Are these alternatives better than Pocket Network?
"Better" is subjective. The list is sorted by Value Score — coins with stronger fundamentals at the top. But the score doesn't capture everything: network effects, brand recognition, regulatory clarity, and adoption speed are additional factors. Use the list as a starting point for deeper research, not as a final buy decision.
How were these alternatives selected?
We filter all coins in our database (1000+ coins) by the same category as Pocket Network (Infrastructure), exclude Pocket Network itself, and sort by Value Score descending. The top 7 are listed here. The list auto-updates as scores change (hourly).